About Nobodies and Heartless

[Morning Twilight]

If nobodies and heartless are the things that split from a person when they succomb to darkness and if nobodies are an empty shell without a heart all that's missing is a heart to make a complete person again right?
Wouldn't that mean that a heartless is a heart and the word "heartless" is an oxymoron? Wouldn't that therefore also make "nobody" an oxymoron too?
Did anyone else notice this?
And if they are the peices that break off of a person then why didn't xeanort just try to get back together with his heartless?
And why did everyone say that nobodies have no right to exhist. They have the same right to exhist as heartless. So basically heartless have no right to exhist either.

 

[doublesword2]

Yep, you're right.

 

[Eclipse]

i noticed this, and this was posted last week lol

yes it's an oxymoron, for infact a heartless is a heart by itself

and a nobody is a body/soul by itself

although the reports said the reason why it is called a heartless because it is formed from the darkness inside people's hearts, so i'm guessing they got the name because cruel, selfish, evil people are considered heartless, xD

 

[KeYbLaDe_MaStEr3]

no the heartless may be hearts themselves but they have no heart because a heart can not have a heart get it?
and i'm not sure about the nobodies.
whats n oxymoron?