- Joined
- Jul 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,689
- Awards
- 8
Edit: how do you do spoilers?
[ spoilers ] fdsjnosgfdjhopsgfdjopsgfd [ /spoilers ] without spaces.
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
Edit: how do you do spoilers?
No, it really didn't. If anything, it cemented it.Yeah but the ending threw that out the window
Plenty was revealed.
like the correlation between data and hearts, something touched up on KH2, is explained better.
but these detials are compeltely triviall. especially RG one. RG was never confirmed to be that, so any confirmation on that was more of those who assumed it.we learn about torments and what they mean for all of the various characters, what they are in torment about. We learn how Riku made it off of Destiny Islands when RG wasn't an in-between world. We learn how far back the connection between XH and Riku started, where Pluto went off to, etc.
BBS secret ending pretty much cleared that up so no worries on that.The story of BBS is brought to the present, thus making it relevant moving forward. Certain character get reprisals. We learn what is in the letter.
but it's development about the past, basically it only revealed something that was in the past.it's to the same level as the disney worlds in COM. it's not really something that will affect much understanding. sure it's good insight to know, but not really a necessity considering characters are changing.We see more character interaction and development between Sora and Riku, while also highlighting such characters as Kairi, Nami, and Roxas.
depends, this is the first i heard of it, and people can move on without secret endings. though i only consider BBS a true "secret ending" because nomura described it as the real ending, as for the rest they were officially known as "secret movie". still, not much of a necessity.With Re:Coded we get the secret ending pointing toward KH3D which has "a very important conversation" in it.
the meaning of tormen don't see it too important, but like i've said, this information doesn't seem exclusive to re:coded. that and the last part was really much your personal reason of why it should be a game.We learn what each character is in torment about and -why- it matters. It gives the players an emotional connection to "being in torment" and makes us want to save them.
i don't know what you mean "how they would even begin to move forward with that". BBS secret ending did more than just show which ones are in torment. it gave us more information that was left vague on coded. for example Ansem the Wise's data hidden in sora which gives a big hint.Sure you can say BBS showed which character needed to be saved and it did, but it didnt give any hint whatsoever about what they were in torment over. Or how they would even begin to move forward with that. Coded does a lot more than people give it credit for.
If they were trivial then they wouldn't have bothered to reveal them. They were mysteries I've had since KH1, so, to me, it was definitely something more than trivial.but these detials are compeltely triviall. especially RG one. RG was never confirmed to be that, so any confirmation on that was more of those who assumed it.
Only through the story of coded is it possible though. BBS secret ending might have let the FANS know it, but Coded makes it clear for the CHARACTERS which is what makes it important to the story.BBS secret ending pretty much cleared that up so no worries on that.
Yeah, kind of like BBS.but it's development about the past
Well, Nomura said it himself, pay attention to the news a bit more.depends, this is the first i heard of it
Then you're kind of foolish, as their torments and being saved from them is what the next titles is going to be about. It's very important.the meaning of tormen don't see it too important
Play Re:Coded then and actually pay attention to more than just the "reveals" or the "twists" and you'll figure it out.i don't know what you mean "how they would even begin to move forward with that".
No, it really didn't.BBS secret ending did more than just show which ones are in torment.
Um, Coded says the exact same thing. BBS didn't give more information, it gave the same information.it gave us more information that was left vague on coded. for example Ansem the Wise's data hidden in sora which gives a big hint.
That's how you know it's important. If it was "exclusive" to Re:Coded then that means it doesnt have that great of an effect to the story as a whole. For example, Xion. She is something that is largely (so far anyway) exclusive to 358/2 Days. That doesn't make her more important, if anything, it diminishes her importance.like i've said nothing (story-wise) seems to be exclusive to re:coded.
that's to you though. plus those mysteries seem like the type to be left unanswered and still wont affect the story too much. and i think even kh2 vaguely answered some of them. such as pluto.If they were trivial then they wouldn't have bothered to reveal them. They were mysteries I've had since KH1, so, to me, it was definitely something more than trivial.
but i'm not arguing whether the events of coded should exist or not, only saying that it's more of a type to be explained rather than to play it all.Only through the story of coded is it possible though. BBS secret ending might have let the FANS know it, but Coded makes it clear for the CHARACTERS which is what makes it important to the story.
BBS is very different. BBS has some aspects sora won't know that still greatly affect his story. that's why their was a riku scenario in COM instead of flashbacks in KH2 (though flashbacks could've helped too)Yeah, kind of like BBS.
i'm pretty sure that was the past considering their torment was losing their hearts which isn't the case anymore.And no, it is actually nothing like that. Coded deals much with the present. Riku and Kairi having torments is something that is specifically about the present, not the past for example. I don't think you know what you're talking about.
meaning of torment and torment itself is different. i'm talking about what it means. coded gave examples to torments but not a concrete definition for it in the kh series. i dont see it too important. and from the way coded ended, theres still alot of room to give an even more clear definition of torment in the next title.Then you're kind of foolish, as their torments and being saved from them is what the next titles is going to be about. It's very important.
i can't, it's not released yet though i am sure i will play it when it does, but that's not the point. i know it's not all about "reveals" and "twists", but those are the major aspects to make it more of a story than an actual event in time.Play Re:Coded then and actually pay attention to more than just the "reveals" or the "twists" and you'll figure it out.
but it didn't say by whom it was from. coded was slightly more vague in the ending.Um, Coded says the exact same thing. BBS didn't give more information, it gave the same information.
Xion is only one aspect that should be left unanswered. plus considering Xion never met sora, i'm sure the next title will give insight on her for sora to give him enough motive to mend her form her hurtingThat's how you know it's important. If it was "exclusive" to Re:Coded then that means it doesnt have that great of an effect to the story as a whole. For example, Xion. She is something that is largely (so far anyway) exclusive to 358/2 Days. That doesn't make her more important, if anything, it diminishes her importance.
Except they were mysteries that WERE answered, IN CODED. Meaning that Nomura considered them mysteries worth answering.that's to you though. plus those mysteries seem like the type to be left unanswered and still wont affect the story too much. and i think even kh2 vaguely answered some of them. such as pluto.
Well stop because that's not even what I was talking about.but i'm not arguing whether the events of coded should exist or not, only saying that it's more of a type to be explained rather than to play it all.
Just because something happened in the past doesn't mean they can't still be in torment over it. That was the whole point.i'm pretty sure that was the past considering their torment was losing their hearts which isn't the case anymore.
Well, lucky for us, what you deem important has no baring on what is actually important in KH. And in KH, torment is important.i dont see it too important.
Yes, it did.but it didn't say by whom it was from.
missing the point yet again.Xion is only one aspect that should be left unanswered. plus considering Xion never met sora, i'm sure the next title will give insight on her for sora to give him enough motive to mend her form her hurting
You seriously don't know that.re:coded doesn't have any information that won't be re-explained in kh that makes it vital to have.
You do realize this was not the argument we were having. Stop making it about what you consider "disposable".what i'm saying is that it's disposable. but doesn't mean it should be disposed of. the only way i can explain it is like this.
doesn't mean we have to consider them that important just because nomura wanted to answer them. rememer kh was originally thought to be a one-shot. like i said before it's more of a + than a necessity.Except they were mysteries that WERE answered, IN CODED. Meaning that Nomura considered them mysteries worth answering.
but it boils down to it in your post.Well stop because that's not even what I was talking about.
but the example you gave wasn't the case. that was more of an example for the ones that weren't exactly answered in re:coded.Just because something happened in the past doesn't mean they can't still be in torment over it. That was the whole point.
try quoting the rest before commenting. i said the meaning of torment, not torment itself. like i said the definition as it stands in re:coded is far too vague and only gave examples. kh3d probably will give a more clear definition.Well, lucky for us, what you deem important has no baring on what is actually important in KH. And in KH, torment is important.
care to point it out?Yes, it did.
i wasn't trying to stay on point on that comment.missing the point yet again.
think about it, if the next kh going to be from both sora and/or riku's perspective who aren't aware of the events of re:coded. don't you think for story's and sora's sake they would explain it? especially how it greatly affects sora himself, he would have to have at least have knowledge that re:coded happened in the series.You seriously don't know that.
doesn't mean we have to consider them that important just because nomura wanted to answer them. rememer kh was originally thought to be a one-shot. like i said before it's more of a + than a necessity.
but it boils down to it in your post.
your point on that topic was it makes it clear for the character, which it does but not a big enough reason to make a game out of it. only big enough to mention it a certain point in time.
but the example you gave wasn't the case. that was more of an example for the ones that weren't exactly answered in re:coded.
try quoting the rest before commenting. i said the meaning of torment, not torment itself. like i said the definition as it stands in re:coded is far too vague and only gave examples. kh3d probably will give a more clear definition.
care to point it out?
i wasn't trying to stay on point on that comment.
think about it, if the next kh going to be from both sora and/or riku's perspective who aren't aware of the events of re:coded. don't you think for story's and sora's sake they would explain it? especially how it greatly affects sora himself, he would have to have at least have knowledge that re:coded happened in the series.
unlike COM, where in kh2 he starts a new adventure and completely oblivious of the previous one.
ouch, lets not insult. still, she simply believes that everything is important and should all be treated equally. which most fans don't agree.heartseams is a tool. she thinks that a game that has hours of repetitive gameplay, no new worlds, no new characters, and no new plot revelations besides 'loltorment' is relevant to the series. Lol dude, what character interactions are you talking about? Data sora? come on. Nobody cares about that. And you dare compare the relevance of bbs to the relevance of coded. Lol im startin to think that youre just arguing for the sake of arguing. You cant be serious.
will do. as for your question re:coded merely answered some things we didn't care about along with barely introducing stuff that will touch on other titles., the contents of the letter is answered. but with BBS i dont think we even need to worry too much what the letter says.Give it up bro. Its not even worth it. But answer this for me: did everything that was of relevance in coded come to the light in the other titles? The torment? The contents of the letter(which we never saw)?
I don't see what KH originally being expected to only last one titles has to do with much. If it's something worth answering then that means it isn't trivial, no matter how much you think so. If it was trivial, he wouldnt bother answering it, that simple.doesn't mean we have to consider them that important just because nomura wanted to answer them. rememer kh was originally thought to be a one-shot. like i said before it's more of a + than a necessity.
No, it doesn't. I was making comments on what I believed was revealed in the game, and then you started making comments about how it isn't a necessity and that its disposable. Which was not what i was arguing, i was just arguing what it revealed, and what the pros of it were. I was making no comment on its "exclusiveity" or any of the other crap you pull forth to try and lower its worth.but it boils down to it in your post.
I only quote the parts I respond to.try quoting the rest before commenting.
Nami says in Coded that it came from Ansem. Which is what BBS' ending also says. They reveal the same amount of info about that subject.care to point it out?
So basically you were just sprouting a useless and irrelevant comment.i wasn't trying to stay on point on that comment.
Zip your vag, you don't know anything about anything, and it shows.djares181 said:heartseams is a tool. she thinks that a game that has hours of repetitive gameplay, no new worlds, no new characters, and no new plot revelations besides 'loltorment' is relevant to the series. Lol dude, what character interactions are you talking about? Data sora? come on. Nobody cares about that. And you dare compare the relevance of bbs to the relevance of coded. Lol im startin to think that youre just arguing for the sake of arguing. You cant be serious.
Give it up bro. Its not even worth it. But answer this for me: did everything that was of relevance in coded come to the light in the other titles? The torment? The contents of the letter(which we never saw)?
I cared about it when it was on the Cellphone.Juat another DS fan tryna prove there game matters...in shorill say this.
No one cared when it was on Cellphone I dont think a remake on DS will make it any better.
THE DS PRINTS MONEY!
Juat another DS fan tryna prove there game matters...in shorill say this.
No one cared when it was on Cellphone I dont think a remake on DS will make it any better.
THE DS PRINTS MONEY!
I fucking love allister shes all like cool story bro especially after I gave up.
So? Why does what everyone else thinks have any baring on the quality of a game? It doesn't.Point is no one else dkd as it was just that sidegame.
and the fact you haven't even played it yet shows how useless -your- opinion is.The fact is if we were to rank coded honestly id go right next to days
Some-what useless in my opinion..
you're very good at pointing out how little you actually know when it comes to this series.I see im not the only person that see's whats really important in kh.
Point is no one else dkd as it was just that sidegame.
The fact is if we were to rank coded honestly id go right next to days.
Some-what useless in my opinion.
If you read the whole torment thing and never got in tot he game but played BBS bam youd know.
Good for you. Some of us, however, actually DO care about the characters in KH as they are what hold the story together, and development for such characters is considered a plus.I could care less about these supposed character interactions that dont even matter.