Prove a theory? It wouldn't be a theory then, would it?
I think your concept of a theory is a bit off. I'm not out
to prove anything. I'm just suggesting an idea and providing
certain support. Thing is though, if you can't disprove this
theory, then it's not technically illogical, it just might not
agree with your logic.
Possible until proven impossible.
When you make a claims like you're making, you should have something to back them up with. Even if they *are* theories. It is not anyone else's job to disprove it, it's your job to prove it (or as you're putting it, "support" it. When you set out to making a theory, the last thing you should is make it technically possible but baseless and not very worthy of consideration. There is a very big difference between something being *possible* and something being *plausible*. Een if your theory *is* technically possibly maybe perhaps debatably within the realm of possibility, if it has no proof, I don't see why it's valid.
I'm skeptical, but maybe just simply this will get the point across better if you still don't understand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russel's_teapot
Last edited: