- Joined
- May 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,615
- Awards
- 6
- Age
- 35
- Location
- A world that never was
- Website
- www.freewebs.com
To note: this is referring to the normal ending(s) of KHII, not Final Mix or any secret endings.
There are, to my opinion, two endings of the second Kingdom Hearts installment for Playstation II. The first ending extends from the final defeat of Xemnas through Sora and Riku finding themselves in the world of darkness (the desolate, beautiful beach in the moonlight). The second ending extends from the opening of the Door to the Light through to the very end of the game, after the credits.
The reason I call these two separate endings of Kingdom Hearts II is that I find them very thematically opposed, entirely different consequences of Sora's (and Riku's) long journey to that point. And personally, I found the first ending far more convincing and therefore preferable.
Don't get me wrong, I like happy endings, and my suspicion is that someone developing the game decided it really needed one, despite everything. But the story of the games is not one that necessarily invites this kind of "happy ending"--throughout all of them, there is a recognition of trial, change, and sacrifice, even at the same time as there is a recognition of the will to continue through them. Think of the endings of Kingdom Hearts and Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories; those are in the same spirit, I think, as the first ending of Kingdom Hearts II, on the beach in the darkness. Sora and Riku are not defeated or destroyed by this ending, but they realize it is where they have come to through their efforts.
When the Door to Light opens, it's a free pass from the universe that, up to this point, hadn't been in the habit of giving Sora so much as a break. It tries to (or seems to) reset the game to when everybody was 'happy' (but they weren't, really) on Destiny Islands. And when it does this, it cannot but erase some of the journey that brought Sora to where he was, and most noticeably, the first ending (which I thought quite important in many ways) entirely loses its significance.
Here is a Youtube video for any who would like to see what I am attempting to describe; the "first ending" is from about 2:35 - 7:05 (or possibly 8:20), and the "second ending" from there beyond the end of the video.
Your thoughts?
There are, to my opinion, two endings of the second Kingdom Hearts installment for Playstation II. The first ending extends from the final defeat of Xemnas through Sora and Riku finding themselves in the world of darkness (the desolate, beautiful beach in the moonlight). The second ending extends from the opening of the Door to the Light through to the very end of the game, after the credits.
The reason I call these two separate endings of Kingdom Hearts II is that I find them very thematically opposed, entirely different consequences of Sora's (and Riku's) long journey to that point. And personally, I found the first ending far more convincing and therefore preferable.
Don't get me wrong, I like happy endings, and my suspicion is that someone developing the game decided it really needed one, despite everything. But the story of the games is not one that necessarily invites this kind of "happy ending"--throughout all of them, there is a recognition of trial, change, and sacrifice, even at the same time as there is a recognition of the will to continue through them. Think of the endings of Kingdom Hearts and Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories; those are in the same spirit, I think, as the first ending of Kingdom Hearts II, on the beach in the darkness. Sora and Riku are not defeated or destroyed by this ending, but they realize it is where they have come to through their efforts.
When the Door to Light opens, it's a free pass from the universe that, up to this point, hadn't been in the habit of giving Sora so much as a break. It tries to (or seems to) reset the game to when everybody was 'happy' (but they weren't, really) on Destiny Islands. And when it does this, it cannot but erase some of the journey that brought Sora to where he was, and most noticeably, the first ending (which I thought quite important in many ways) entirely loses its significance.
Here is a Youtube video for any who would like to see what I am attempting to describe; the "first ending" is from about 2:35 - 7:05 (or possibly 8:20), and the "second ending" from there beyond the end of the video.
Your thoughts?