She means without artificial help (heart/lung machines, breathing machines, etc).
wouldve been nice if she said that the first time
Because you keep flip flopping back and forth. The situations you come up with are stupid and impractical.
Not really.
The question was this "If a person is responsible for a situation, that person [is/is not] responsible for all
consequences of that situation."
That isnt a specific enough question. Someone may be responsible for the consequences of their actions, but not neccessarily of the situation (other people contribute to a situation too, which wasnt specified but still possible. They could be responsible for some of the consequences too). If a woman puts herself at risk of rape, she isnt responsible for the rapist going to jail and getting beaten to death in a shower, for example, though that is a consequence of the situation the woman is partly responsible for being in.
i.e. you haven't said you don't so i assume you do
I said I disagree with abortion, except in situations like rape and if the child is threatening the mother's life.
So no, I dont agree with late term abortions, seeing as they come under "abortions"
Seriously... That would be obvious.
Others (krexia) have said they agree with abortion, which late term aboritons are a part of. If you dont specify, I cant help but assume you do.
If I say "I like dogs", you would assume I like dogs. But if you were to find out that I only like one breed of dog, that would mean that I was a bit misleading.
i.e. so you don't have to assume: I don't
Amazing...
Except there's a difference between
+survive by being biologically hooked up to another human
+survive through the attention of another human/s
Which you clearly don't understand.
Oh, I forgot how she said those differences in her post. Silly me, not reading things that arnt there. How inconsiderate of me.
Here _EX, look after this sick person.
Here _EX, sew your intestines to this sick person's digestive tract and be a living life support machine
Krexia said "survive unassisted." Both, children and premature children, require assistance, some more than others, but assistance none the less. If she meant to say all that extra stuff, she shouldve said it. I dont have to go any further into what she is saying that what she directly says. I am not going to read her mind.
If I said, "rape is cool" and you were all like "so you think woman getting raped at a party is cool?" and I said "No, idiot, I meant to say I think rape is cool if it were hitler getting raped by some large, violent man because I hate hitler. Man, cant you read! You must be trolling!" you would feel pretty wronged. So, go have a cry somewhere else because you cant blame me for what Krexia didnt specify.
I don't think she ever said she was in favor of late-term abortions. Saying that you're "pro-choice" isn't equivalent to saying you approve of abortion at all times.
No, but one can only assume.
What should we draw from someone saying they are pro-choice? that they dont actually approve of any form of abortion?
