There appears to be alot of opposition towards my theories.
Though I agree that all the theories against my theories are
possible, they're still just theories and not fact.
This is a given. Also, there isn't "a lot of opposition." We're discussing and we disagree; if you're going to introduce a theory, this is the way it goes. You don't have to make it sound like you're under fire.
lol though, that Xion being Riku's unbirth was just a joke, ha
(sadly, my open-mindedness make me agree such a thing is possible)
It was used as an example. I also feel it is possible with the very slightest feeling I can possibly feel. In other words,
my open-mindedness keeps me from discounting possibilities, but I hold others in higher regard. Just as you do.
But anyway, it was a joke I made to point out how people are
jumping to conclusions with a Xion/Aqua connection.
Still more are jumping to the conclusion that Xion MUST have resulted when Namine and Roxas did, despite the fact that Namine is already stretching the limits of believability.
Sora's vessel splitting in two? That's like saying 1=2
The way it was described, Namine gets the right arm
and left leg, and Roxas gets the torso and the other limbs.
Sorry but I strongly disagree with that and consider it
barely possible.
But it's possible for Sora's body to go to Kairi, whose body and heart are already intact, and for him to inherit Ven's without changing his appearance.
Sora being a Humans Heartless is not impossible but
we've never seen a human heartless so there's no
way to know if it's possible. Heart Reconstruction is
also not impossible and nothing make either idea
more likely than the other.
Xehanort's Heartless. I'm continually puzzled by Heart Reconstruction; Sora's heart was not destroyed, therefore there's nothing to reconstruct. Only a heart to be saved from the darkness, which is what Sora does every time he kills a Heartless.
Alot of you have been stating that my idea doesn't
make sense because Namine faded into Kairi and
Roxas faded into Sora but I already considered that
when developing my theory and this is my response:
I think that certain key factors determine whose
Nobody is whose. In Namine's case, both Kairi and
Sora left an imprint on Sora's vessel but for some
reason Kairi's imprint was more dominant than
Sora's resulting in Namine to become primarily
Kairi's Nobody. This might be because Kairi's
heart is stronger since it is pure so maybe her
imprint was stronger too. As for Roxas, I think
he has a piece of Sora's essence in his heart,
perhaps this essence is responsible for Roxas
obtaining active force and a physical form. If
this essence was returned to Sora, Roxas might
fade back into Sora as well. Thus reasonable
explaination.
This does not change the fact that Sora and Kairi are both receiving alien bodies. I find it much more plausible that Namine is less substantial than Roxas, which would account for her returning only to Kairi, who doesn't need much now that her body and heart have both been restored.
About Xion, don't get me wrong, I too was
anticipating an Aqua-based character to be
the 14th Member but when I heard she had
the same voice as Kairi, I knew my hopes
would be crushed. And now that her face
has been revealed, I am partly sad to say
Xion looks nothing like Aqua. It is possible
that the two are connected (even though
I don't think so) However, they look nothing
alike. Xion looks like Kairi, and Kairi looks
nothing like Aqua. (just like Ven looks
pretty much nothing like Sora)
Yes, she closely resembles Kairi. And yes, her hair looks like a mix of Kairi's and Aqua's. And yes, Namine's hair is the only thing that distinguishes her from Kairi in the first place. Ven resembles Sora less than Aqua resembles Kairi.
I'm not trying to convince anyone that
my ideas are right and others are wrong.
I'm simply stating my opinion and trying
to show that my ideas are possible.
Trying to disprove theories with theories
is a terrible mistake, one I always avoid.
If I don't believe in a theory, I can at least
recognize it as possible and not try to
shove my theories down the throats of
others. Despite your confidence in what
you are saying, they're still just theories
and ultimately you can't prove them.
You are making an argument. You can't make an argument without using supporting facts and without the desire to change someone's opinion; which is the definition of just about everyone on here. If you're not doing that, why are you here? The whole point is to contribute, discuss, allow your ideas to evolve, and when you are proven wrong, accept it.
Narrow-mindedness is a curse.
So is pomposity. Please stop making these veiled accusations, you're fooling no one. We have theories that we hold to be more plausible than others, just like you, and if you don't want us to bring them up, then yes. You're being narrow-minded.
