I don't like looking at the issue in that perspective though, because it means that something drastic has to happen to the kid before any sort of blame can be placed and even then, it's focusing too much on placing blame on someone rather than seeing what could have been done to prevent this from happening. I know it doesn't really sound like there's a difference, but I personally see a huge distinction between "It's the parents fault for raising their child to be weak-minded and not knowing how to deal with problems" and "Something should have been done for this kid since there were too many things out of his control that hurt him mentally and emotionally." Not all parents chose to be parents, which is why attention shouldn't really be taken away from the issue of teachers not helping when they should. They knowingly chose that job and yet, they won't do anything to help a kid deal with bullying because they feel that's a parent's job. It certainly is, but bad parenting is a lot less controllable compared to bad teaching. School staff can be fired if a severe enough incident occurs, but parent's can't really be replaced. Schools not helping kids with anything outside of education is a more controllable issue than bad parenting, which is why I think attention really shouldn't be taken away from it towards bad parenting because they are two separate kinds of issues that require different solutions. Not saying it's worse than bad parenting, but when you try to shift the blame to bad parenting in a story like this, it deters from reaching a more appropriate solution.
Oh and I was just talking about that 'herp derp' stuff, kinda caught me off guard since I was in serious mode for this thread~