The fact is creativity has alot to do witht he abnormal for if we were normal we would not think or create outside of the limits in which normality lies.
Creativity is anything but abnormal; it only requires lateral thinking, which you are entirely capable of doing from a logical standpoint. The
Miller-Urey experiment, designed to simulate the atmosphere of prebiotic earth, is something I consider a feat of creative engineering. Whether or not the atmosphere truly was the way they imagined is another matter entirely. Yet I am sure you would not consider either scientist crazy for using electric sparks to simulate lightning.
Im not hardwired like everyone else.
That is a given.
If I were there is no way could cook up new characters in a flash and draw them out. If I were like everyone else I could not make a story relating to new worlds and such.
Everyone is 'wired' differently; no two humans have the exact same neural network. And anyone intelligent is capable of envisaging stories in their mind.
Can you honestly sit here and say that an average everyday guy could write at Harry Potter level?
Bad choice of literature. That aside, yes: J.K. Rowling was and still is an average everyday Briton who struck a pot of gold at the end of her rainbow.
Hell even better example an abstract artists can use lines shapes and other stuff to convey how they feel, they can get there inspiraton from dreams visions or even people.
And you know that their work
actually has meaning...how? I could splash a bucket of paint on a canvas and call myself an abstract artist, but does that make me one? Does that give my bucket splash of paint any more meaning than that -- a splash of paint?
Art is a way of showing others what you see as you see it.
Correct.
Havent you ever wondered why SOME get what a picture means and SOME just wont ever see it? It takes that little abnormalness to reach that level.
Wrong. Art is open to interpretation, and different viewers, readers, and audiences will derive different meanings from the work. It only takes creativity to produce and interpret a work of art; and everyone with a pulse and a state of consciousness is able to do that.
Ive done research on this girl I find her as bad as it seems to admit shes probably legit...That aside even f she wasnt want to know what the first think most people said when they saw her work? She has to have some brain defect or something causing it. What m saying is she isnt considered normal one for her talent two for her overall gift.
Again, what girl? Just because you know who she is, doesn't mean we do. Because I also know
that boy who is capable of creativity despite being sane of mind.
Tell me something are you an artist?
Anyone who produces art is an artist. So therefore, yes; and in more ways than one. What's your point?
Did I say it? All I said was its odd most famous artists HAVE traces of being insane to a degree.
The key words there are "traces" and "to a degree." There is no 'average' human; we are all different from one another, and in that respect we all also exhibit "traces" of insanity, and are in our own way "insane to a degree." Because of this, 'insanity' and 'craziness' are terms reserved for those who truly betray social norms and have a real mental condition. Lest our whole world be inhabited by the crazies.
Yes they are but what they see is different.
We all see things differently.