Cincinnati Man Spanks Son Over Poor Video Gaming

[Ulti]

It shouldn't because it technically doesn't apply. This spanking was for a stupid reason. If it was legit, it would be discussable.

 

[_EX]

Father of the year.

 

[Diastyl]

that is child cruelty!

 

[Shadow Fenix]

I give props to that man for even spanking the child. It's not a beating. That's how tons of people were raised. I was raised like that. I also occasionally got the belt too. It's common, it makes your kid not stupid.

Exactly, it mainly teaches them common sense. You do something you shouldn't, you get spanked like fuck. Easy as that

 

[_EX]

Exactly, it mainly teaches them common sense. You do something you shouldn't, you get spanked like fuck. Easy as that

Common sense like dont time out in a game or theres pain.

 

[Shadow Soldier]

Common sense like dont time out in a game or theres pain.

Again, I'm pretty sure this thread isn't talking about the game anymore.

 

[Firo]

What concerns me is that the father was so into the game he spanked the kid. I think daddy has a secret.

 

[Orion]

If he sucked badly enough at a game that anyone should think he deserved a spanking and take it upon themselves to deliver it, that kid probably deserved it.

 

[VirusCoreHacker]

Seems like a semi perfect father son moment, Not many people spend time with their dads. Dad and son start bonding.

Boy learns not to suck at video games

or anal probing for that matter.

:<

 

[gelandporn]

So...physical abuse makes you smart? Uh huh? Really? I fail to see how that makes any sense. All it does is say "Hey, if you think for yourself, you get beaten." How does that make you smart exactly?

Inappropriate spanking aside (which is the case here), what you deem as "physical abuse" is a legitimate tool to help a child learn.

Children can't always understand why certain things are bad for them when there isn't always a direct consequence, such as riding a bike in the middle of the street (if they don't get hit, they won't know the difference). By classically conditioning a child to associate such poor behavior with a more tangible punishment, such as pain, it becomes easier for them to remember the right thing to do.

We're not talking about a beating here, just a swift slap on the butt or the head.

 

[Ulti]

Spankings should only occur if the child risks his or her life. A slap on the wrist if it is something harmless or stupid. Spankings are supposed to be painful. Pain tells a child what happens if they do something like that again. It has nothing to do with good or bad. Children don't see the world that way. It is all about consequences. They run into the street, they get a painful spank. They know if they do that again, they will feel pain. So, they stop running into the street. But a spanking doesn't work alone. You have to make sure the child knows why he or she is being spanked. Otherwise, they'll just think everything they do is wrong.

 

[Cloud]

Spankings should only occur if the child risks his or her life. A slap on the wrist if it is something harmless or stupid. Spankings are supposed to be painful. Pain tells a child what happens if they do something like that again. It has nothing to do with good or bad. Children don't see the world that way. It is all about consequences. They run into the street, they get a painful spank. They know if they do that again, they will feel pain. So, they stop running into the street. But a spanking doesn't work alone. You have to make sure the child knows why he or she is being spanked. Otherwise, they'll just think everything they do is wrong.

Someone's been watching Super nanny, haven't they?

 

[Ulti]

I never watched the show :\

 

[Ophan]

Someone's been watching Super nanny, haven't they?

Location: England.

LOL,

you don't have to watch that show
to know proper disciplinary action on children.
As far as the situation with the father and son,
he's just a bad parent, or at least for that moment
since we don't know the lives of the two.

 

[Katsuno_Hitomi]

Call me old-fashioned, but I support spanking. The way I see it, it's like Pavlov's dog. Severe misbehavior=pain. I was spanked all the time as a child, and I'm not scarred for life.

Spanking over poor performance in a video game, however, is... I don't know what it is other than utterly insane. It's just a video game, for heavens sake!

 

[Shade737]

I'm not into spanking. I'm more of a grounding type of guy so I leave spanking as a last resort.

 

[Cloud]

I'm not into spanking. I'm more of a grounding type of guy so I leave spanking as a last resort.

How many children have you got at 18?

 

[Shade737]

How many children have you got at 18?

I have none. I'm talking about when I get children.

 

[Cloud]

Ah, i see. It's just that you said "i leave spanking as a last resort." So i assumed you already did.

 

[XIII Heartless]

What an imbecile. I've never believed that any parent is justified in striking their children; it should never be considered a resort. It only shows the simplicity and impatience of parents who are incapable of communicating with their children and instead of consulting with them, they contemplate a system of fear and physical superiority. And considering this man's supposed justification, it's just disgusting.

Your name reflects what you're views are: neglectful. Are you serious? I've gotten much worse than a slap to the ass. You ever been hit with a belt, or a switch? My mom hit me with a shoe once (sandals, I think) just because she couldn't get to a belt. It works out for the best for children, it really is one of the best ways to teach them not to do something again. I'm not saying it's the right solution for everything that kids do wrong, but to call the guy an imbecile for it....well, the guy is more than an imbecile considering why he spanked the kid. But the trick is to distinguish that line between discipline and abuse.